TLDR: In a New York courtroom, the Diddy legal team challenges his Mann Act convictions, arguing misapplied law as prosecutors push back.
We were back in the Southern District of New York courtroom this morning for a special hearing to determine whether Diddy’s two convictions for transporting sex workers across state lines will be dismissed. With sentencing set for next Friday and Diddy’s future hanging in the balance, the stakes could not be higher.
Defence Strategy
Diddy, dressed in jailhouse clothing with a grown-out, greying beard, sat beside his legal team as they argued the government misapplied the Mann Act. The defence compared Diddy’s actions to amateur pornography, claiming it fell under First Amendment protection, as he is what we would consider an amateur director. The defence continued by pointing out that none of the witnesses used the word “prostitution” in their testimony and highlighted how the Justice Department, now known as the Department of War or War Department, normally reserves the statute for more serious cases involving minors or large-scale criminal commercial enterprises.
They also highlighted the Mann Act’s long and controversial racist and sexist history. The law was passed in 1910, originally intended to prevent “immoral” relationships, and was often used to target Black men, immigrants, and other marginalized groups, while policing women’s sexuality and reinforcing social and racial hierarchies.
Prosecution Pushback
Prosecutors countered that labels don’t change facts. They said Diddy masterminded the so-called “Freak Offs,” arranged travel for women, paid them, and directed the activities, making clear his intent to transport individuals for sex. In their words, “intent matters more than terminology.” They argued that recording the encounters doesn’t transform prostitution into protected expression, and that Diddy’s conduct which included drug usage as well as violence against Jane and Cassie was exactly what the law was intended for.
Judge’s Questions
Judge Arun Subramanian pressed both sides throughout the hearing. He asked prosecutors to provide clear examples where the Mann Act was applied in similar ways, while also questioning whether the defence should have raised certain arguments earlier. His exchanges made clear that precedent and timing will weigh heavily in his ruling.
What’s Next
Diddy’s family, including his sons Quincy and Justin in addition to his daughters were present in court, watching as both sides traded arguments that could dramatically alter what happens next week. For now, the convictions remain in place, but Judge Subramanian confirmed that he will issue his decision later today.
Stay with HipHopCanada as we continue to bring you updates on this developing story.
